I was reading up on the new anti-piracy measures in Windows Vista on Information Week this morning and was reminded of that Star Trek episode in which Q first introduces Picard and crew to the Borg. There’s this scene after the Borg’s first curt surrender demand in which Q says something like, whew, they’re tough, you sure you don’t want me as a part of the crew?
In a nutshell, borrowing the car from mom for a hot date with the trampy girl down the block will be easier than trying to run Windows Vista if it even thinks your copy is not legit. But you know what, despite what some analysts are saying, people are still going to run Windows Vista because there simply is no alternative for at least 90% of users out there. Comments like this,
Wilcox, however, sees it as a mistake. “Microsoft’s making software potentially harder to use. I don’t think it’s a good move for them to make things hard when competitors are making things easier.”
are laughable. What competitors? The desktop OS war has been over for about 10 years now. Microsoft won, Microsoft is the man, resistance is futile, you will be assimilated, you will run Genuine Windows Vista.
I do agree that the potential hassles, to say nothing of the hardware requirements will make many stick with XP for a while, as I plan to. But we’ve seen this all before. Windows Vista will make its way into homes and offices via new PC purchases. And I’m sure that the next version of MS Office will have some Vista exclusive features to further drive open a wedge for Vista to get into the corporate space.
So Microsoft really doesn’t have anything to lose by getting tough on pirated Windows. I’m sure the pirates will find ways around the new checks, which ultimately will make trouble for hapless end users rather than the pirates themselves. But mass migration to Linux or MacOS is not likely to happen. If it were so easy to migrate, it would have happened already. Again, Microsoft won the OS war on the PC and they know it.